News:

Welcome to Qday.forum  :: Be kind, courteous and help other people.

Main Menu

AI coding assistants in 2026 - which ones are you actually using in production - help needed

Started by Cass, Jun 06, 2026, 12:03 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Topic: AI coding assistants in 2026 - which ones are you actually using in production - help needed   Views(Read 48 times)

Cass

GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, Claude Code and various others have all matured significantly. The question in 2026 is less whether AI coding tools are useful and more which ones have become genuinely indispensable for specific workflows. For people who code professionally: what has made it into your actual daily setup and what did you try and discard?

Cheeky Blake

Cursor is the one I kept. The codebase indexing and the ability to ask questions about your own code rather than just generating snippets is what pushed it ahead of Copilot for me

Fan22

Claude Code for anything involving a large refactor or architectural decision. The context window handling and the quality of reasoning about tradeoffs is noticeably better than the competition for that type of work

ShawnMichaels

Copilot is still installed because it is already in the budget and it is good enough for autocomplete. For anything more complex I switch to something with better reasoning

ShawnMichaels99

Local models through Continue.dev for anything touching client data. The quality gap from cloud models is real but data sovereignty is a legal requirement not a preference in our context

BrittleQuarry

I tried Windsurf and found the agent mode aggressive in a way that made me nervous for production code. It makes decisions without asking and I prefer tools that check before acting

Related Topics (1)