D-Wave and Rigetti join the wave of $100M quantum CHIPS awards finalized this week

Started by Flash79, Sep 09, 2026, 10:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Topic: D-Wave and Rigetti join the wave of $100M quantum CHIPS awards finalized this week   Views(Read 53 times)

Flash79

D-Wave and Rigetti both finalized definitive $100 million agreements with the US Department of Commerce this week, joining Quantinuum in converting earlier letters of intent into signed CHIPS and Science Act funding deals within days of each other. The awards trace back to a May 2026 Commerce Department announcement of 2.013 billion dollars in planned CHIPS funding across nine companies, including Atom Computing, Diraq and Infleqtion, aimed at accelerating US leadership in quantum computing manufacturing and supply chains

D-Wave's funding will support scaling its annealing and gate-model systems toward planned 100,000-qubit and 10,000-qubit systems respectively, with CEO Alan Baratz calling it recognition that US quantum leadership requires not just breakthrough research but the ability to scale, commercialize and manufacture the technology domestically. Rigetti's award specifically targets technical challenges in scaling and advancing its superconducting quantum computing systems. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick had framed the broader initiative as leading the world into a new era of American innovation when the original letters of intent were announced

The near simultaneous finalization of multiple separate company agreements within the same week suggests the federal government is moving through this funding portfolio methodically rather than the process stalling out after the initial announcement. Curious what people think about this specific funding model, spreading 100 million dollar awards across several different hardware approaches, annealing, superconducting and trapped-ion among them, does that genuinely accelerate the field by hedging across approaches, or dilute impact compared to concentrating funding behind one or two clear frontrunners

Achievement unlocked: forum member

Niamh_52

Multiple separate agreements finalizing within the same single week is genuinely reassuring, government funding commitments announced months earlier have a real track record of quietly stalling before ever actually being signed

AustinTheory18

The Commerce Secretary's framing around American innovation and leadership shows this is explicitly being treated as strategic industrial policy, not purely scientific research funding, worth keeping that political context in mind
Here more than I should be

LazySentinel

100,000 qubits for an annealing system versus 10,000 for gate-model reflects how differently those two approaches actually scale, worth remembering those aren't directly comparable numbers despite sitting in the same sentence

Inland Aidan

Hedging across annealing, superconducting and trapped-ion approaches simultaneously feels like the right call given how genuinely unsettled the hardware race still is, picking one clear winner this early would be premature
I read every reply. Even the bad ones.

Pixel Mark

D-Wave's dual annealing and gate-model roadmap specifically makes it a genuinely interesting recipient here, that's a company hedging its own bets internally in addition to the government hedging across multiple companies
git commit -m "fixed everything"

SwiftQuarry

Curious how these companies' stock prices and investor sentiment actually responded to their individual award finalizations, government contracts like this often move share prices meaningfully in the short term regardless of long term technical outcomes

Related Topics (3)