Burnham's Manchester City comments raise questions for the new football regulator

Started by ParallelSelf56, Today at 02:13 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Topic: Burnham's Manchester City comments raise questions for the new football regulator   Views(Read 65 times)
Active members in this topic:
ParallelSelf56(1)

ParallelSelf56

The Times has a story about Manchester City, the new Independent Football Regulator and Prime Minister Andy Burnham, and it follows a week of controversy. Sam Wallace in the Telegraph also wrote a pointed column on it. When asked about the independent commission's verdict on City, Burnham said losing the club's Abu Dhabi ownership would concern him a great deal. Critics say that sits awkwardly with the independence of the regulator he once strongly supported

Some background for anyone who has not followed it. An independent commission has ruled on the long running case over City's alleged breaches of Premier League financial rules. According to the Telegraph's summary, it found evidence of repeated breaches, including problems with financial records, compliance and disclosure over many years. That puts the question of the owners' suitability on the table

This is where the Independent Football Regulator comes in. It was set up to oversee club ownership and financial sustainability without interference from the Premier League or anyone else. Under its owners, directors and senior executives test, it has to decide whether owners are fit to run clubs. Burnham, as Mayor of Greater Manchester, praised City's owners as huge partners in the city's regeneration, and he enthusiastically backed the regulator's independence back in 2024. Nothing about that process has been decided yet

Wallace's argument is that Burnham cannot have it both ways. If the regulator is independent, the Prime Minister commenting on whether he wants a particular owner to stay looks like pressure, whether he intends it or not. Bloomberg has reported that the remarks irritated some government officials. There are also wider questions about how much international relationships should weigh on decisions about football clubs. Football and politics in Manchester have always been closely tied

I know this one touches on politics, so let's keep it to football governance and away from party arguments. City fans will see things very differently from everyone else, which is fair enough. Should politicians stay completely out of decisions about club ownership? And is this the first real test of whether the regulator can act independently?