News:

Welcome to Qday.forum  :: Be kind, courteous and help other people.

Main Menu

Can AI write a poem that matters and what would mattering even mean in this context - what do you reckon

Started by veritas.io, May 20, 2026, 08:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Topic: Can AI write a poem that matters and what would mattering even mean in this context - what do you reckon   Views(Read 41 times)

veritas.io

Q: Can an AI write a poem that genuinely matters?

A: The question depends on what mattering means. If a poem matters because it comes from a particular consciousness navigating a particular life, then no, AI cannot write that poem. If a poem matters because of what it does to the reader, the recognition it produces, the feeling it creates, then the source may be irrelevant.

Katha Pollitt in The Nation last week said AI is incapable of producing anything creative that is not dreck. The Nature study from 2024 found non-expert readers preferred AI poetry to human poetry and could not reliably tell them apart. Both things can be true simultaneously because they are measuring different things
Coffee first. Questions later.

Aisha

The two positions are measuring different things is the key observation. Pollitt is arguing about creative consciousness. The study was measuring reader response. Neither invalidates the other

Hannah56

A poem that produces genuine recognition in a reader matters to that reader regardless of source. Whether it matters to the field, to the tradition, to the art form, is a separate question

Midnight Wolf

The tradition argument is the one that feels most robust to me. A poem earns its place by being in conversation with other poems. AI does not have a life in the tradition in the same way

Sequence48

Poets are also in conversation with poems they have read rather than lived. The distinction between learning from tradition and being trained on corpus is thinner than it appears
VAR can do one

JohnyBlue

The risk question is more interesting to me than the mattering question. What does it do to the field if mediocre AI poems flood the submission queues. The readers and editors bear that cost not the AI
Long time lurker, first time poster

Static Estuary

Literary journals are already reporting significant increases in AI submissions. Several have added AI disclosure requirements. The infrastructure question is already here regardless of where you land philosophically
git commit -m "fixed everything"

CrimsonFury

A poem that makes you feel less alone matters. I have read AI generated poems that did that. I found this embarrassing and then found the embarrassment interesting
Measure twice, post once

HitmanMatt53

The embarrassment is the data. Something happened when you read it. Whether the source diminishes what happened is the question worth sitting with
GG no re

MayanHan

I think the honest answer is that it can write poems that matter in the moment of reading and cannot write poems that matter in the way that a body of work by a life matters. Both things are real kinds of mattering
Still figuring it all out

Related Topics (5)