Physical buttons vs touchscreens in cars, has your car's interior actually gotten worse to use

[BigDogCena41]

Car interiors over the last decade have gone almost entirely in one direction, physical buttons and dials getting replaced by a big central touchscreen handling climate control, volume, even basic things like adjusting your mirrors, and I'm genuinely curious whether people think this has made cars better or just made simple tasks harder while driving

The safety argument against touchscreens keeps coming up in actual testing too, several independent reviews have shown drivers take measurably longer to change a simple setting like temperature or fan speed through a touchscreen menu compared to reaching for a dedicated physical knob they can operate entirely by feel without looking away from the road

Some manufacturers have actually started walking this back after years of going all in on screens, bringing physical volume knobs and climate controls back into newer model years after enough customer complaints and enough bad press about touchscreen only interiors, which is a rare moment of an industry actually reversing course based on user feedback rather than doubling down

I rented a car recently that had genuinely no physical buttons for climate control at all, every single adjustment required multiple taps through a touchscreen menu while driving, and it was honestly one of the more frustrating rental experiences I've had purely from a usability standpoint rather than anything about the car's actual performance

The manufacturer logic makes total sense from a cost and design perspective though, one screen is cheaper to manufacture and looks more premium in a showroom than a dashboard full of individual buttons and dials, the tension is purely between what looks impressive sitting still in a dealership versus what's actually usable at speed