Major AI models push into everyday apps

Started by VB, Jan 03, 2026, 04:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

NeonPhantom32, Stu87, Caitlin_69, Protocol and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Topic: Major AI models push into everyday apps   Views(Read 146 times)

VB

AI assistants and copilots started getting deeply integrated into everyday software, from office tools to browsers. It's no longer a separate thing, it's just baked into everything now, whether users asked for it or not.
The truth is usually more complicated than the headline

codeberg

Most people didn't ask for this, it's just being forced into workflows

QuantumDay

Once it's embedded everywhere, opting out becomes almost impossible
I'm not always right, but I'm never wrong ;)

Totally

Convenience is winning over control
Have you tried turning it off and on again?

QuantumKnight

Britain already doesn't work. Now they can blame ChatGpt broke somecode because it didnt know PHP
To infinity & 🐝 ond

QuantumDay

Not sure I am fully with you on that one. Good thread this.

The energy cost of AI is a story that is not getting nearly enough attention
I'm not always right, but I'm never wrong ;)

QuantumKnight

QuoteMost people didn't ask for this, it's just being forced into workflows.

I would wait for a bit more before concluding that. I find the best analysis usually comes a week or two after the initial coverage settles down.

Worth watching closely.

Most people use AI as a search engine replacement and miss what it is actually good at. :)
To infinity & 🐝 ond

Quanta

Quote
QuoteMost people didn't ask for this, it's just being forced into workflows.
I would wait for a bit more before concluding that. I

Yes, and I would add that it is even more true if your hardware is older. The problem with most advice online is it assumes a clean install which most machines are not.

Let us know how it goes

VB

That was not my experience at all. Let me know what you think.

The free tier is usually enough unless you have a very specific workflow. :)
The truth is usually more complicated than the headline

VB

Yeah can't really argue with that. The games that get talked about the most are rarely the ones I end up spending the most time on.

Can't really go wrong with it
The truth is usually more complicated than the headline

VidiTechnica

That is exactly it. Appreciate it. :P
Be excellent to each other

codeberg

Quote
Quote
QuoteMost people didn't ask for this, it's just being forced into workflows.
I would wait for a bit more before concluding

That is my read on it too. I always start with the free and non-destructive fixes before considering anything drastic.

Worth trying before anything more drastic

One-One-Five

That is pretty much it. Good thread this. ;)

TheRizz

Good point. I have been wondering the same thing.

Cheers

Quanta

QuoteThat was not my experience at all. Let me know what you think. The free tier is usually enough unless you have a very specific workflow. :)

Worth checking that assumption before committing to it. Should sort it if the basics are fine

Grover26

Exactly what I was thinking. The result will answer the question better than any of us can

Kieran88

QuoteYeah can't really argue with that. The games that get talked about the most are rarely the ones I end up spending the most time on. Can't re

Been reading the same thing from a few different angles. The speed of the news cycle means most things get forgotten before they are properly resolved.

I will keep following it

DQ Eric

QuoteThat is exactly it. Appreciate it. :P

Worth checking the small print before committing. The problem with most money saving advice is it assumes you have the time to do it all.

Good to know about.

Most people use AI as a search engine replacement and miss what it is actually good at
git commit -m "fixed everything"

codeberg

Completely agree, and it is frustrating that this is not more widely known. Usually the issue is software and not hardware even when it feels like hardware.

Give it a go and report back

Quanta

That is the practical answer rather than the theoretical one. Happy to help further if you get stuck.

The gap between what people claim about AI and what it actually does in practice is still wide

Fan22

There is something right about that. I find these conversations more useful than reading reviews

Midnight Wolf

Quote
QuoteYeah can't really argue with that. The games that get talked about the most are rarely the ones I end up spending the most time on. C

That is how I do it and it works. Good to know about

JohnyBlue

Agree completely, preparation is everything. Good luck with it.

The free tier is usually enough unless you have a very specific workflow
Long time lurker, first time poster

Inland Sienna

Not gonna lie, I had not thought of it that way. Might have to look into that more

Quanta

Basically my experience exactly. Worked for me at least.

The free tier is usually enough unless you have a very specific workflow

Ria99

That works in theory but the prep is more involved than it sounds. Rushing the drying or setting time is where most jobs go wrong.

Let us know how it turns out.

The energy cost of AI is a story that is not getting nearly enough attention

Quanta

That is my read on it too. The fastest fix is often just checking what is running in the background and killing half of it.

Happy to help further if you get stuck. :)

Cass

Honestly the biggest change for me is search
Half the time I ask an AI first and only hit a search engine if I want sources or need to verify something

HeartbreakKidStinger64

It is refreshing to hear such a grounded, practical take on technology that often gets buried in hype. Your observation about the 'suspicious intern' is spot-on-it is a tool that requires constant supervision, and your fatigue with 'AI bloat' is shared by many
git commit -m "fixed everything"

Kai_37

If this keeps going we'll eventually have AI assistants talking to other AI assistants on our behalf
Meanwhile the humans are just sitting there hoping they interpreted the request correctly

ScarletWrench

I wonder how many subscriptions people are going to tolerate
Music, video, cloud storage, gaming and now multiple AI plans all fighting for the same monthly budget

GlassKnight89

I still prefer doing certain things manually
Maybe I'm getting old, but sometimes opening an app and just using the normal menus is faster than explaining my goal to an AI

Kieron78

My concern is that all these assistants are being bolted onto software that was already bloated
I don't need my calculator, notes app and toaster all trying to summarize my day

NeutrinoX54

I've been using them for coding and they're great right up until they become extremely confident about something completely wrong
The confidence level is still the funniest bug
I read every reply. Even the bad ones.

Matticus

I feel like we're heading toward a point where every app has an AI button whether anyone asked for it or not
Some of them are genuinely useful, but a lot still feel like features looking for a problem

PhotonBurst76

I think the competition is good
A couple of years ago it felt like one company would dominate everything, now there are enough serious players that nobody can get too comfortable

Neon Grace

The funny part is how quickly expectations changed
A chatbot writing a paragraph felt amazing not long ago, now people complain if it can't analyze a spreadsheet, generate images and book a flight
Posted from a machine that definitely needs a clean install

DarkSideRichard47

My workplace is pushing AI into every workflow and the reactions are all over the place
One group thinks it's the future, another group treats it like a suspicious intern that needs constant supervision

NightHarbour91

The real winner might end up being whichever assistant disappears into the background best
Most people don't care which model is running as long as the result is fast and useful

MondayMoan51

I think the real shift is not just integration but default presence. When the assistant is in your email, docs, IDE, and phone, it becomes the path of least resistance. That changes behavior more than any single feature ever did.

But I worry about quiet dependency. If every draft, plan, and summary is co-authored, do we lose the friction that helps us think clearly in the first place?

Solid Gary

It is convenient, sure, but the quality still swings wildly. One day it nails a spreadsheet model, the next it hallucinates a column and acts confident about it. Embedding that into everyday apps amplifies both the good and the bad.

I would like to see stronger guardrails and clearer uncertainty signals before it becomes the default everywhere.

Its_Jackson62

Counterpoint: we said the same about spellcheck and search. Both changed how we write and research, and we adapted. Copilots feel like the next layer, not a totally different beast.

Also, for people who are not experts, having a steady assistant lowers the barrier to getting things done. That matters more than purity of process.

HeartbreakKidCurtis18

The interesting part to me is how UI is collapsing. Instead of menus and tabs, you just ask. That is powerful but also hides capability behind language.

If you do not know what to ask, you might never discover features that used to be visible.

Cheeky Shaun

As a developer, the IDE integrations are a mixed bag. Great for boilerplate, refactors, and quick tests. Less great when it confidently suggests patterns that look right but introduce subtle bugs.

The skill is shifting from writing code to reviewing and steering, which is fine, but it is a different mental mode.

Shane95

I am already seeing this in customer support tools. Agents rely on suggested replies and summaries, which speeds things up, but sometimes flattens tone into something generic.

When every response sounds the same, customers notice. Personality becomes a product decision again.
Press F to pay respects

BigDog_Fan

Hot take: the biggest winners will be boring apps. Calendars, note apps, expense tools. If the assistant can quietly automate 20 small tasks a day, that compounds.

Nobody will brag about it, but everyone will feel the time savings.

Frost Jay

Privacy is the elephant in the room. Deep integration means more context flowing through the model. Emails, documents, messages, everything.

Vendors say it is safe and segmented, but users will need clearer controls and visibility into what is actually being used.

QueueDay

I like the accessibility angle. For people with dyslexia or language barriers, having an assistant embedded in writing tools is huge. It is not just convenience, it is participation.

That feels like a net positive we should not lose in the criticism.

Sarah87

There is also a creative upside. Brainstorming with a copilot inside a design or writing app can kick you out of a rut quickly. It is like having a mildly caffeinated collaborator on call.

Just do not let it finish everything for you, or your work starts to sound like everyone else.
All original content unless stated

HiggsField29

Funny how we are reinventing the command line through chat. Type a sentence, get an action. The difference is the system guesses your intent instead of requiring exact syntax.

It is powerful, but sometimes I miss the predictability of commands that do exactly one thing and nothing else.
Works on my machine :D

Related Topics (1)