Do you actually trust AI generated code you haven't personally reviewed line by line

[NeonPhantom]

With how good AI coding assistants have gotten, I'm curious how many people here are actually reading and understanding every line an AI generates before shipping it versus just running the tests, seeing green checkmarks, and moving on with your day trusting the output implicitly

My own honest answer depends heavily on the stakes involved, a quick script to reformat some data I'll happily accept without reading closely, but anything touching authentication, payment processing, or user data gets read line by line regardless of how confident the tool sounded generating it

The genuinely tricky part is that AI generated code often looks completely correct on the surface, proper syntax, sensible variable names, comments that read as though someone thoughtful wrote them, which makes subtle logic errors or security issues significantly harder to spot compared to obviously sloppy human written code that at least signals it needs a closer look

There's also a real skill atrophy worry buried in all this, if you're consistently accepting AI generated code without deeply understanding why it works, you're not building the same kind of debugging instincts you'd build writing everything yourself from scratch, and that instinct is exactly what you need the day something actually breaks in production

Curious whether people have actually been burned by this yet, a bug that slipped through specifically because the code looked plausible enough that nobody looked closely, versus people who've had consistently positive experiences and think this whole concern is overblown at this point