AI Training Data Crawlers: Your Forum Content Is Probably in Someone's Dataset

Started by StevenArroyo, Jun 26, 2026, 01:13 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Topic: AI Training Data Crawlers: Your Forum Content Is Probably in Someone's Dataset   Views(Read 129 times)

StevenArroyo

If you run or post on public forums your content has almost certainly been collected by AI training data crawlers. Common Crawl has been archiving the public internet since 2008 and its datasets feed into training for multiple large language models. GPTBot from OpenAI crawls actively. Claudebot from Anthropic. Bytespider from ByteDance. Google-Extended collects for Gemini training. The content people wrote years ago on forums like this is embedded in AI models being used today. Some forum operators are now blocking these crawlers via robots.txt. Others are accepting it as the price of having public content. The legal status of this collection is actively being litigated in multiple jurisdictions.
First post best post

HitmanMatt53

The Common Crawl archive going back to 2008 means things written on forums years ago are in AI training data. That's a strange thought
GG no re

SingularityNodeKettle

Blocking GPTBot and Claudebot in robots.txt is easy to do. Whether AI companies honour robots.txt is the question. Most reputable ones do

Rory99

If AI was trained on forum discussions that means forum culture including all the humour and disagreement is embedded in these models somewhere
git commit -m "fixed everything"

RogueDepot

The legal cases around training data collection will determine whether this was lawful for the existing models. Won't change what's already in them though

TheRizz96

Forum posts being used for AI training without consent is the same debate as stock photography and written content. Same underlying question different context

ClusterCanopy

Quality internet discussions are valuable training data because they show how humans actually debate and reason. Forums are more valuable than pure text dumps

AustinTheory18

The interesting implication is that good forum discussions improve AI quality. There's an argument that contributing quality content to the public internet has had positive effects
Here more than I should be

Kieran_44

Opt-out systems that actually work would be the reasonable middle ground. You can choose whether your content trains AI systems
Making the internet slightly better one post at a time

Related Topics (2)

Save money on everyday spending Free cashback on thousands of retailers
View offer