Which WWE Star Should Win Money in the Bank Next?

[Bussin99]

Money in the Bank works best when the winner feels like they could change the whole main-event picture with one cash-in. WWE can use it to crown a future world champion, refresh someone who has gone slightly cold, or give a dangerous heel the kind of shortcut that makes every title match feel unsafe. The fun question is whether the briefcase should go to the obvious next star, or someone who needs that one big moment to break through

[Ridge]

I would rather see the briefcase go to someone on the edge of the main event than someone already made. Money in the Bank should feel like a launchpad, not just another trophy for a top name

[Brett42]

A heel winner usually makes the briefcase more interesting because every champion suddenly has to watch their back. The cheap cash-in is old, but it still works when the right person has it

[Zach72]

WWE needs to be careful not to waste it. If the winner carries the briefcase for months with no real plan, the whole thing loses its edge

[ShawnMichaels]

I like when the briefcase creates tension on weekly TV. Even if there is no cash-in, the threat should matter whenever a champion is hurt, tired, or distracted

[Kane93]

People keep forgetting Gable! Imagine the weekly anxiety of Chad Gable sneaking around the Alpha Academy locker room with that metal box waiting for Damian Priest to take a breather.

[Calm Brad]

That logic is fine until they cash in on Tuesday at a house show and drop the title back two weeks later. The booking needs to protect the prestige of the contract first, regardless of who is holding it.

[Python53]

Drew McIntyre deserves it purely for the crowd work after what happened last time with CM Punk ruining the moment. Let the Scottish Psychopath hold the leverage and terrorize RAW for three months.