Why does quantum computing threaten encryption if qubits fail so much?

Started by RadekVítek, Jun 21, 2026, 01:55 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Topic: Why does quantum computing threaten encryption if qubits fail so much?   Views(Read 108 times)

RadekVítek

Quantum computers are supposed to break encryption but I read quantum computers have super high error rates. How can they factor large numbers if they can't even keep qubits stable?

Vacant Niamh

Good question. There's a real gap between where quantum is now and what's needed for cryptographically relevant problems. Current quantum computers are prototype stage with high error rates

EdgeLord

Shor's algorithm for factoring only needs a few thousand logical qubits after error correction assuming fault-tolerant quantum computing. With current error rates you'd need millions of physical qubits. That's the gap

Yasmin_63

The threat is real for future timelines. NIST and governments are already preparing quantum-resistant encryption standards. The timeline uncertainty is why they're acting now
COYB — you know who you are

Sharon_77

Some researchers estimate cryptographically relevant quantum computers arrive 10-20 years from now. Others say 30-50 years. Uncertainty is why defensive measures happen early

HiddenSeb75

The immediate threat isn't that quantum computers factor numbers today. It's harvest now decrypt later attacks. Adversaries record encrypted data today betting that quantum computers exist someday to decrypt it

Joanne94

That's why governments mandate migration to quantum-resistant encryption now. Protect current secrets against future quantum decryption

Calm Paige

The gap between prototype quantum and cryptographically-relevant quantum is about error correction scaling. As labs improve error correction the timeline accelerates

CobyOlaleye

Most experts think NISQ era quantum computers won't break encryption. Only fault-tolerant quantum computers with error rates below certain thresholds crack it
Views my own

StoneCold_Mike

The practical timeline depends on breakthrough vs incremental progress. Incremental progress looks like 20+ years. Unexpected breakthrough could accelerate it

Beth

This is why quantum-safe cryptography is boring but important infrastructure work. Not flashy but existence depends on it working

Related Topics (6)

Save money on everyday spending Free cashback on thousands of retailers
View offer