Where Will the First Useful Quantum Computer Be Built?

[MessiGOAT21]

Quantum computing has become a global effort, and one of the most interesting questions is where the first useful machine will appear. The United States, China, Europe, Japan, Canada, Australia and the UK all have serious programmes. Each has different strengths, from deep pocketed tech companies to world class universities and long term national strategies. Rather than treating it as a race with one winner, I think it is more useful to look at what each region does well. That gives a more realistic, and more hopeful, view of how the field is developing

The United States has the largest concentration of private investment and big tech involvement. IBM, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, IonQ, Quantinuum's US operations, PsiQuantum, Atom Computing and many others are based there. Government support comes through the National Quantum Initiative, DARPA's Quantum Benchmarking Initiative and the Department of Energy's national labs. DARPA has set a clear target of testing whether a utility scale machine can exist by 2033, and the DOE has published eight priority science problems for such machines. The combination of private capital and public direction is very powerful

China has invested heavily in quantum science for over a decade, with major research centres such as those in Hefei. Chinese teams have produced notable results, including the Jiuzhang photonic experiments and the Zuchongzhi superconducting processors. China has also been a leader in quantum communication, including satellite based quantum key distribution with the Micius satellite launched in 2016. Tsinghua University and others continue to publish strong work, such as recent research on deterministic photonic graph states. Its programme combines long term state funding with large research teams

Europe brings a strong scientific base and a growing industrial sector. The EU's Quantum Flagship launched in 2018, and the Quantum Internet Alliance has just received €47.5 million to build a full stack quantum internet prototype. Germany is running a €640 million competition for fault tolerant quantum computers, and France has a lively startup scene including Pasqal, Quandela, Alice and Bob and Quobly. The Netherlands, Finland, Austria, Switzerland and Denmark all punch well above their weight. Europe's challenge has been turning brilliant research into large companies, but that is changing

The UK deserves its own mention. Its national quantum programme has run since 2014, and the 2023 national quantum strategy committed £2.5 billion over ten years. Oxford, Cambridge, Bristol, Sussex, Glasgow and other universities are leaders in areas like trapped ions, photonics and quantum networking. Companies such as Quantinuum's UK operations, Universal Quantum, Oxford Quantum Circuits, Riverlane and Nu Quantum are widely respected. The UK's strength is in specialised expertise, especially error correction software and networking

Japan, Canada and Australia round out the picture. Japan's RIKEN and Fujitsu have built superconducting machines, and the JHPC-quantum project is linking quantum computers with the Fugaku supercomputer. Canada has D-Wave, Xanadu, Photonic Inc and world class research in Waterloo and Toronto. Australia has strong silicon spin qubit research through companies like Diraq and Silicon Quantum Computing, and PsiQuantum is building a major site in Brisbane. Each of these countries has carved out a clear niche

What stands out to me is how international the field remains. Researchers move between countries, companies open offices around the world and many breakthroughs come from collaborations across borders. IBM's machines are installed in Japan, Germany, Spain and elsewhere. European startups raise money in the US and build sites in Asia. Universal Quantum's new funding, for example, will expand a research centre in Singapore. The first useful quantum computer may be built in one place, but it will rely on ideas and parts from many

If I had to guess, I would say the first machine that clearly delivers useful scientific results will probably be built in the United States, simply because of the scale of investment and the number of serious contenders. But I would not be surprised if a key component, such as the error correction software, the control systems or the interconnects, came from somewhere else. The UK, Europe, Japan and Australia all have a real chance of contributing something essential. And China may well produce important results in parallel

The positive way to see this is that the world is investing in quantum computing from many directions at once. That spreads the risk, increases the chance that someone finds a breakthrough and creates jobs and skills in many places. For smaller countries like the UK, the smart move is to focus on strengths and build partnerships rather than trying to do everything. Being part of the supply chain for the first useful machine can be just as valuable as building it

Talent is perhaps the most important ingredient of all. Building a quantum computer needs physicists, electrical engineers, software developers, materials scientists and cryogenics specialists working closely together. Countries that train and keep these people will have a lasting advantage, wherever the first machine appears. Visa policies, university funding and quality of life all affect where talent chooses to work. The UK's universities give it a strong starting point here

Supply chains matter more than headlines suggest. Dilution refrigerators, specialised lasers, high quality materials and control electronics come from a relatively small number of suppliers around the world. A country that hosts key suppliers holds an important position, even if it never builds a complete machine. Finland's Bluefors in cryogenics is a good example of a small country playing a vital role. Building resilient, international supply chains will help the whole field move faster

Where do you think the first useful quantum computer will be built? Which country or region do you think is most underrated? And should countries focus on building complete machines, or on specialising in key parts of the stack?

The Year Of Quantum From Concept To Reality In 2025www.mckinsey.com