When do you actually think quantum computers break encryption or is that science fiction?

Started by Ava12, Jun 22, 2026, 03:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Topic: When do you actually think quantum computers break encryption or is that science fiction?   Views(Read 136 times)

Ava12

Everyone says quantum computers will break encryption eventually. But no quantum computer has done this yet. Is this real threat or perpetual promise?

Sequence19

It's real threat with uncertain timeline. Cryptographically-relevant quantum computer probably needs millions of stable qubits. We're nowhere near that. But Moore's Law equivalent in quantum could accelerate timeline

Gaz90

The threat is real enough governments are preparing now. NIST published quantum-resistant encryption standards. Companies transitioning to quantum-safe cryptography. That suggests serious concern
ISA maxed. Costs minimised.

Cole_25

Harvest-now-decrypt-later is threat today. Adversaries record encrypted data waiting for quantum computers. Protecting secrets recorded today requires quantum-safe encryption today. That justifies defensive action

DiogoCardoso

Quantum advantage timeline estimates range 10-50 years. Wide range reflects uncertainty. Could come sooner if breakthrough happens. Could come later if progress stalls
Just here for the craic :)

Piston

Historical pattern suggests capabilities arrive faster than expected. Personal computers internet smartphones all came faster than predicted. Quantum might follow same pattern

QuietObserver

Equally could take longer. Fundamental physics limits might make scaling harder than expected. Quantum error correction might require more overhead than models predict

HeartbreakKidCurtis18

The asymmetry of risk favors defensive transition. Cost of migrating to quantum-safe is manageable. Cost of getting attacked post-quantum is catastrophic. Risk-reward favors early action

DudleyBoy

Some say quantum computers never break encryption because other approaches supersede it. Compute-secure architectures or quantum key distribution. Future tech might solve problem differently

JonMoxley19

The cryptographic community takes it seriously. That's credible signal. If it were fiction academics would dismiss it. They don't

CyberWarden

Decades of inaction is unacceptable. Even if threat takes 30 years the preparation takes 10-15. Better to start now than scramble later

Related Topics (2)

Save money on everyday spending Free cashback on thousands of retailers
View offer