Post-quantum encryption, which companies look ahead so far?

[WhatUQuant]

The gap between what is being said publicly and what is actually happening is interesting.

Most coverage focuses on the technology and skips the operational reality.

I have done the obvious searches and got the usual recycled answers so thought I would ask here instead.

Any thoughts welcome.

[codeberg]

That works until it does not. I always start with the free and non-destructive fixes before considering anything drastic.

That is the sensible starting point.

[Lucy05]

The terms and conditions usually tell a different story. The things that save you money consistently are rarely the exciting ones.

Worth a look if you have not already.

Most organisations are not ready and probably cannot move fast enough even if they tried.

[Lucy05]

Worth checking the small print before committing. Might save you more than you think.

NIST finalising the standards is the moment things need to accelerate from.

[Matticus]

I hear you but I think that is the wrong read. You cannot judge a season on three games in either direction.

Good debate though, fair play.

[MiniElliot]

I don't know, I had a different experience. Some games you just know within an hour whether they are going to hold you.

Can't really go wrong with it.

The gap between the labs and deployment in the real world is still massive.

[Zach91]

There is something true in that that is hard to articulate. I tend to notice the things that seem almost accidental but probably are not.

Happy to keep discussing this.

[Jan79]

The terms and conditions usually tell a different story. The things that save you money consistently are rarely the exciting ones. Worth a l

That checks out. Not a life changer but it adds up.

[CodyRhodes99]

The gap between what is being said publicly and what is actually happening is interesting. Most coverage focuses on the technology and skips

I had been looking at it the wrong way I think. Good to know, thanks.

The companies quietly working on PQC hardware are more interesting than the ones making headlines.

[error.404]

That is the sensible route. Turned out alright when I did it.

[DarkEnergy27]

That is the sensible approach. Good to know about.

[QuantumDay]

Makes sense. Cheers.

The companies quietly working on PQC hardware are more interesting than the ones making headlines.

[WaveFunction34]

That is the approach I always take now. Let us know how it turns out.

Most organisations are not ready and probably cannot move fast enough even if they tried.

[QuantumKnight]

From what I saw that checks out. I find the best analysis usually comes a week or two after the initial coverage settles down.

Worth watching closely.

NIST finalising the standards is the moment things need to accelerate from.

[StringTheory83]

Still think the same, yeah. Management makes as much difference as the players at this level.

We will know soon enough.

[SortedMate]

That is the conclusion most people following it closely are landing on. I find the best analysis usually comes a week or two after the initial coverage settles down.

Curious to see how this develops.

[Tracey]

Worth checking the small print before committing. Most people just accept the standard rate and wonder why they are not getting ahead.

I will keep an eye on it.

[ParallelSelf90]

Cannot disagree with that. Management makes as much difference as the players at this level.

The result will answer the question better than any of us can.