If quantum sensing comes before quantum computing why are companies funding computing?

Started by MurkyVoyager, Jun 21, 2026, 11:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Topic: If quantum sensing comes before quantum computing why are companies funding computing?   Views(Read 105 times)

MurkyVoyager

Sensing has faster timeline than computing but everyone talks about quantum computers. Why are venture and governments investing billions in computing if sensing is closer?
Posted from a machine that definitely needs a clean install

NightOwl94

Hype matters. Quantum computing is science fiction. Breaks encryption solves impossible problems. That story attracts capital and public attention way more than improved clocks
Not financial advice. Not medical advice. Just vibes.

Always_David72

The market size is different. Quantum computing addressable market is massive potentially replacing all computing. Quantum sensing is narrower application. Economics favor computing investment
Still figuring it all out

Compass

Governments compete on computing power. National security angles point to quantum advantage in simulations AI. Computing has geopolitical importance sensing doesn't
Making the internet slightly better one post at a time

ParallelSelf34

Sensing becomes products faster so it funds itself. First companies deploying quantum sensors generate revenue. That attracts private capital. Computing needs government funding longer

MiguelCardozo

Quantum computing gets 80% media coverage 20% investment might be actual. Sensing gets 20% coverage 80% investment. Market follows narrative not reality

TheLegendJohn32

Some companies do both. IonQ does computing. Rigetti does computing. But smaller companies focus on sensing. Market bifurcates
It's only banter... mostly

Louise84

The VCs bet on computing winners. If you pick right quantum computing startup becomes trillion-dollar company. Sensing company becomes billion-dollar company. Expected value is higher for computing
rm -rf /bad-ideas

Foundry20

Defense and intelligence agencies fund computing heavily. Signals intelligence code-breaking applications. Sensing doesn't have same national security applications

TheRock

This might be market inefficiency. Resources flow to hype not fundamentals. Good opportunity for patient capital targeting sensing

MondayMoan31

Both will happen. Sensing matures first. Computing follows. The investment mix might be inefficient but eventual outcome is both technologies deployed

Related Topics (6)

Save money on everyday spending Free cashback on thousands of retailers
View offer