Explaining entanglement without the word spooky

[Lucy05]

Every popular article on entanglement reaches for the same spooky action quote and I think it does more harm than good. It makes people believe information travels faster than light, which it does not, and then half the discussion is spent undoing that misunderstanding

My preferred analogy is a pair of gloves split into two boxes. Open one box and see a left glove, and you instantly know the other is right handed. No signal was sent, the correlation was baked in. Yes, I know this is only the classical part of the story and Bell inequalities show the quantum case is genuinely stranger

So here is the challenge. How do you explain what makes entanglement more than glove correlations, in plain language, without maths and without the s word? Best attempt gets my admiration and nothing else