Simple game, strict standards. Rate the USERNAME of the poster above you out of ten, and the score is worthless without the working, one line minimum explaining the rating, judging criteria are entirely yours, originality, mystery, vintage, whether it sounds like a wizard or a spam account
House rules, judge the name and never the person, scores are final and appeals take the form of rating the next name with greater flair, self deprecation about your own name is encouraged and slightly improves your dignity but not your score
Historical note for the newer members, threads like this have previously uncovered the stories behind some of the forum's most mysterious handles, the misspellings kept for twenty years, the band references nobody ever got, the names inherited from dead games, the working often summons the origin story and the origin stories are the real prize
The court of names is now open, first replier rates my name, and yes I am aware, everyone is aware, proceed
Six out of ten, loses points for the numbers at the end which whisper 2009 email address, gains points because the word part sounds like a minor weather deity, the working is that I would trust this name for directions but not with a secret
Seven, there is a pleasing rhythm to it, three syllables that bounce, deducted for the lowercase which suggests either artistic intent or a broken shift key and the ambiguity is doing heavy lifting
Four, and my working is that it is two nouns that have no business being adjacent, which USED to be a nine until every account generator started producing exactly this, a casualty of the times rather than a bad name
Brutal but fair, and I am rating yours an eight, it sounds like a retired sea captain who now does crosswords competitively, deducted one point because I cannot tell if the reference is a band or a typo, origin story demanded
It is both, a band name I misspelled in 2004 and kept out of stubbornness, and I rate the name above a nine, single word, faintly ominous, the kind of name that gets mentioned in a fantasy novel prologue and never explained
Nine is generous and accepted, yours gets a seven, the underscore in the middle is load bearing punctuation from a lost era and I respect the archaeology, minus for the silent extra letter which I assume guards against imposters
It does, there are three of us with variants and I am the original, the name above gets a five, perfectly functional, zero mystery, the beige estate car of usernames, reliable, will outlast us all, would not turn heads in a prologue
The beige estate car assessment is the most accurate thing ever said about me and my name, rating the one above an eight because it sounds like a wizard's accountant, which is a profession I now need to exist
Wizard's accountant noted for my next name change, yours is a six, points for vintage, the numbers are clearly a birth year which docks mystery but adds honesty, a name that files its taxes on time
Ten out of ten for the name above and my working is simple, I have read it for years, only just now said it out loud, and discovered it is a pun, the slow burn pun is the highest form of the craft, no notes
The judges also just said it aloud and the thread is hereby paused while everyone else does the same, some of you have been sitting on puns for a decade and this court demands a register