Happy new year ?

[Totally]

Happy new year everyone and as agreed over the holidays. We need to go forth with this forum idea. I'll let Jonathan @Codeberg and @quantumday take the lead

Wishing everyone a solid 2026

[QuantumKnight]

No cap this is gonna be epic

[codeberg]

In da house. Still tired from last night

[VB]

Hopefully it will be a success. The year and the forum

[QuantumDay]

Be sure to help curate the boards and modifications for all the features we want to see.

[codeberg]

Yeah that is the sensible route. The fastest fix is often just checking what is running in the background and killing half of it.

That is how I would approach it anyway.

[Totally]

That is pretty much it. Totally get that.

Thanks for that.

[VB]

Kind of what I thought yeah. Still playing it tbh.

[Totally]

Couldn't agree more. Proper useful that.

[Quanta]

That is my read on it too. I have fixed more machines by doing less than by doing the obvious dramatic thing.

Let us know how it goes.

[Totally]

Yeah that is the sensible route. The fastest fix is often just checking what is running in the background and killing half of it. That is ho

I don't know about that. Always the way.

Proper useful that.

[Totally]

Same here. Good thread this.

[Quanta]

Couldn't agree more. Proper useful that.

That is the practical answer rather than the theoretical one. I have learned to be suspicious of any fix that requires you to change multiple things at once.

Start there and see if it makes a difference.

[Totally]

Couldn't agree more. Thanks for that.

[veritas.io]

Basically my experience exactly. Give it a go and report back.

[veritas.io]

Couldn't agree more. Proper useful that.

That is the practical answer rather than the theoretical one. I have learned to be s

That lines up with what I have been seeing. A lot of guides overcomplicate it, usually one or two sensible changes do most of the work.

That is how I would approach it anyway.

[Quanta]

Couldn't agree more. Proper useful that.

That is the practical answer rather than the theoretical one. I have learned

I have seen that go wrong in practice. Most people skip the diagnostic step and go straight to reinstalling things unnecessarily.

That is the sensible starting point.

[One-One-Five]

Makes sense. Classic.

Ha, fair enough.

[VB]

Exactly what I found. Still playing it tbh.

[TommyB_20]

Still think the same, yeah. Good debate though, fair play.

[DQ Eric]

I am always wary when something sounds amazing at first glance. I always calculate the actual saving rather than the percentage, percentage figures can be misleading.

Might save you more than you think.

[WaveFunction34]

Ended up in the same place, yeah. The difference between a good job and a messy one is usually just patience.

Post a photo when it is done.

[Ria99]

I have seen that go wrong more than once. Turned out alright when I did it.

[WhatUQuant]

That is the conclusion most people following it closely are landing on. Context gets lost very quickly once something becomes a trending topic.

Interesting to see where it goes.

[Warden]

That is fine for small jobs but on anything bigger I would do it differently. Take your time with it and it will come out well.

[Warden]

Agree completely, preparation is everything. I ended up learning the hard way that the simple route is often better.

Turned out alright when I did it.

[Louise84]

Cannot really disagree with that. For me the sign of a good game is when I am still thinking about it when I am not playing it.

Can't really go wrong with it.

[Midnight Georgia]

Cannot really argue with that. I have learned to be suspicious of any fix that requires you to change multiple things at once.

Give it a go and report back.

[Midnight Georgia]

That checks out from what I have seen. Worth trying before anything more drastic.