Gemini 3.5 Pro missed its launch window right as four senior researchers jumped ship to rivals

Started by Marcus11, Jul 11, 2026, 10:40 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Topic: Gemini 3.5 Pro missed its launch window right as four senior researchers jumped ship to rivals   Views(Read 107 times)

Marcus11

Gemini 3.5 Pro remains stuck in limited Vertex AI enterprise preview with no confirmed general availability date, having missed the June target Sundar Pichai promised at I/O when he told developers to give us until next month

The delay landed in the same ten day window as four senior Gemini researchers announcing departures for direct competitors, including transformer co author Noam Shazeer reportedly heading to OpenAI and Nobel laureate John Jumper reportedly joining Anthropic

Markets did not shrug this off, Alphabet's stock dropped hard enough in a single session to wipe out roughly 225 billion dollars in market value, and a spokesperson declined to comment when asked about the revised timeline

Reporting points to three linked technical reasons for the slip, token efficiency concerns flagged by early enterprise testers, coding performance that was not yet at flagship standard, and long horizon multi step reasoning that fell short of the bar Google set at I/O

Gemini 3.5 Flash already shipped and is generally available, so this is specifically a Pro tier problem, and the July window Google is now aiming for has become one of the more closely watched launches of the year given everything that happened around it

Saka31

Losing the co author of the actual transformer paper to a competitor in the same week your flagship model slips is about as bad a look as it gets for a research organization

PowerhouseHobbs_AI

225 billion dollars evaporating in a single session tells you the market reads this as a credibility problem, not just a scheduling delay

Louise

Google has historically been fine shipping late but polished, the real question is whether that pattern holds when your top researchers are leaving at the same time
// TODO: write better signature

Canopy

Token efficiency and long horizon reasoning are exactly the areas competitors are hammering right now, so this delay is landing at the worst possible moment competitively

Amber Tiger

I would take researcher departures more seriously than the launch delay itself, models slip all the time but people leaving for named rivals is a much harder signal to explain away

BinaryMonk95

A spokesperson declining to comment during a bad news cycle is its own kind of confirmation, if the story were good they would have said something

PhilippeMercadal

Gemini 3.5 Flash already being solid and generally available takes some of the sting out of this, at least Google has something shipping while Pro sorts itself out

Stephen24

Shazeer leaving Google a second time is wild given how much they reportedly paid to get him back in the first place
Posted from a machine that definitely needs a clean install

Leopard10

Genuinely curious whether the July launch actually happens on schedule or whether we get a third slip once the dust from this settles

Rebecca86

Missing the June launch window and then losing four senior researchers is not a great look. That's the kind of combo that makes investors nervous and gives competitors ammunition.
Never pay full price. Never.

Hollow85

The Vertex AI enterprise preview has been "limited" for months now. If Gemini 3.5 Pro was ready, they'd have pushed it to general availability. The delay suggests something's not quite there yet.

TristanFenwick

Four researchers leaving for rivals is a signal. Whether it's frustration with the pace, internal politics, or just better offers, it's not a good sign for morale. :/

Seb83

Sundar's June target was pretty public. Missing it by this much makes the July date feel shaky too. At this point, I'd bet on another slip unless they announce something concrete soon.

Kane44

Wonder how many of those four researchers were working directly on Gemini 3.5 Pro. If they were core to the project, that could explain part of the delay. If they were on adjacent teams, it's more of a culture issue. :-\

Ella10

Enterprise customers in the Vertex preview are probably getting impatient. They signed up for cutting-edge capabilities, not a perpetual beta test. Some might start looking elsewhere. 8)
Normal is overrated

Save money on everyday spending Free cashback on thousands of retailers
View offer