A new European report maps out exactly why AI copyright law is such a legal mess right now

Started by Isla, Yesterday at 11:52 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Topic: A new European report maps out exactly why AI copyright law is such a legal mess right now   Views(Read 52 times)
Active members in this topic:
Isla(1)

Isla

The Council of Europe's European Audiovisual Observatory published a new report titled Copyright and AI Training, authored by senior legal analyst Diego de la Vega, examining one of the most contested legal questions facing Europe's creative industries, how AI systems get trained on copyrighted material and what that means for the rights of the people who created it. The report traces the explosion in generative AI use since 2022 and lays out why copyright has become such a central concern for both content creators and the companies deploying AI, against the backdrop of the Council of Europe's Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and the EU's AI Act, both still trying to keep pace with the technology

The heart of the legal debate centers on text and data mining exceptions, provisions rooted in the EU's Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive that allow certain uses of copyrighted material without a rightsholder's explicit permission. The report examines the opt-out mechanisms and transparency obligations tied to these exceptions, and highlights persistent doubt over whether they actually cover the full range of ways AI models get trained today, with European, UK and other national approaches diverging significantly on licensing, enforcement and how to balance rightsholders against developers

A separate chapter breaks down the real world German GEMA v OpenAI ruling and digs into the legal status of prompts themselves, the instructions users type into an AI system, asking whether prompting raises its own distinct copyright questions around human authorship. Another chapter compares how major platforms including Adobe, ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot and Midjourney structure their terms of service to divide copyright liability between the platform and the end user. The report's own conclusion is candid, AI is advancing at a meteoric pace and Europe's copyright framework is still trying to catch up, with a second report specifically addressing whether AI generated output itself can be copyrighted expected later this year

Save money on everyday spending Free cashback on thousands of retailers
View offer