IBM had its worst trading day in decades after admitting AI spending is eating its software sales

[WWFRoss95]

IBM shares collapsed nearly 25 to 26 percent, one of the company's worst single day declines in decades, after it released preliminary second quarter results a week early showing enterprise customers had unexpectedly redirected their IT budgets away from software and mainframe deals toward AI infrastructure like servers and memory chips

IBM now expects roughly 17.2 billion dollars in second quarter revenue against a Wall Street consensus of about 17.86 billion, with adjusted earnings of 2.93 dollars per share versus the 3.02 dollars analysts had modeled. CEO Arvind Krishna said the company had anticipated a low single digit decline in its z17 mainframe business but that the actual shortfall was far worse, telling investors that in the final weeks of June clients shifted their capital expenditure toward servers, storage and memory purchases specifically to secure supply constrained infrastructure ahead of expected price increases

Software revenue still grew about 5 percent, but that fell well short of the roughly 10 percent growth analysts had built into their models. Krishna described the company as having faltered in its execution, acknowledging IBM failed to adapt quickly enough to the sudden reprioritization of client spending, which caused a number of large deals to slip past the quarter's close entirely

The selloff spread well beyond IBM itself, dragging down Salesforce, Adobe, Intuit and ServiceNow as investors reassessed enterprise software demand broadly. IBM's chief competitors haven't fared much better this year either, Oracle is down 33 percent year to date and Accenture has fallen 50 percent. The warning intensifies a growing fear across the software sector that the AI infrastructure boom may be cannibalizing budgets from other parts of enterprise technology spending rather than simply adding new demand on top of it. IBM holds its full earnings call on July 22

Da478C37 7A32 415D 9F30 3B2981149F95www.ft.com

[OfficialLuca92]

Companies rushing to secure supply constrained memory and servers ahead of price increases rather than actual demand destruction is an important nuance, this reads more like a timing shock than a permanent shift away from software

[Cesaro27]

5 percent software growth still missing a 10 percent consensus by that much shows just how aggressive analyst expectations had gotten for this sector

[Delulu67]

Krishna openly admitting the company faltered in its execution instead of blaming macro conditions alone is a notably blunt admission from a sitting CEO

[Coastal Estuary]

The contagion into Salesforce, Adobe, Intuit and ServiceNow shows this isn't really an IBM specific story, the market is repricing the entire enterprise software sector's exposure to AI infrastructure spending

[LivMorgan_Legend]

Oracle down 33 percent and Accenture down 50 percent year to date puts IBM's drop in a brutal broader context for the whole sector

[SilverSurfer51]

Curious whether this spending shift reverses once the memory shortage eases or if it's a permanent reallocation of enterprise IT budgets toward AI hardware going forward

[WanderingSentinel]

IBM is a quantum computing leader so I'm buying not selling

[Wasp]

That drop looks dramatic, but it also highlights how aggressively IBM is leaning into the future.

Shifting spend toward AI and quantum is not a weakness, it is a strategic pivot.

Legacy revenue dips happen when a company is repositioning for the next wave.

IBM has done this before and survived bigger transitions.

[Gaz_60]

There is a tendency to view legacy businesses as baggage, but they also fund innovation.

IBM has the rare advantage of established enterprise relationships plus cutting-edge research.

That combination is not easy to replicate.

It gives them time and resources to execute properly.

[Kev49]

Quantum is the part that often gets overlooked in these reactions.

IBM is arguably one of the leaders globally in quantum hardware and ecosystem building.

That is not a short-term revenue driver, but it is a long-term strategic asset.

Markets do not always price that correctly

[John22]

Feels like a classic case of short-term pain for long-term positioning.

AI infrastructure and quantum research are expensive now, but they are exactly where the industry is heading.

IBM is choosing to be early rather than late.

That matters.

[Terry]

There is also a credibility factor.

IBM is not chasing trends blindly, they have been investing in AI and quantum for years.

This is more of an acceleration than a sudden pivot.

That consistency is reassuring.

[Tracey99]

Enterprise customers tend to stick with partners they trust.

IBM has decades of relationships in finance, healthcare, and government.

If those clients start adopting AI and eventually quantum, IBM is already in the room.

That is a strong position.

[DeadChat]

The market reaction feels a bit narrow.

Focusing on software sales decline without fully valuing where that capital is being redirected.

AI and quantum are not side projects, they are core to the next phase of computing

[Octopus]

There is a historical pattern here.

IBM has reinvented itself multiple times, from hardware to services to cloud and now AI and quantum.

Each transition looked messy in the moment.

In hindsight, they were necessary steps.

[Thomas_69]

End of the day, a company with IBM's history, resources, and leadership in quantum is not standing still.

This is a repositioning phase, not a decline.

The future side of the business is where the real story is unfolding

[Dean83]

AI spending eating into software revenue can also be seen as internal evolution.

Instead of external disruption, IBM is disrupting itself.

That is usually a healthier path than being disrupted by others.

[Grace24]

The combination of AI and quantum is where things get interesting.

Hybrid approaches, optimization problems, advanced simulations.

IBM is positioned in both spaces, which could create synergies later on

[William80]

Quantum leadership is not just about hardware.

IBM has built tools, developer ecosystems, and partnerships around it.

That infrastructure could become very valuable as the field matures.

It is a long game, but they are ahead.

[Arty Leah]

Feels like one of those moments that looks negative on the surface but reflects deeper transformation.

The story is not shrinking, it is shifting.

And the direction is toward areas with much larger future potential.

[EventHorizon27]

Legacy systems still matter too.

Many industries rely on stable, proven infrastructure.

IBM continues to serve that need while building the next layer on top.

That balance is not easy to manage.

[Seb83]

There is also a signaling effect.

Heavy investment in AI and quantum tells the market where IBM believes value will be created.

That kind of conviction is worth noting.

[RobVanDam10]

There is a bit of impatience in the market.

Investors want immediate returns, but deep tech cycles take time.

Quantum especially is measured in years, not quarters.

IBM seems willing to play that timeline.

[BankHolidayBlues]

Short-term volatility does not erase long-term capability.

The underlying research, talent, and infrastructure are still there.

If anything, they are being strengthened right now :-)