How many months of expenses do you actually think counts as a genuinely safe emergency fund

[Cobalt Sophie]

Standard financial advice has long recommended keeping somewhere between three and six months of essential living expenses set aside in an easily accessible emergency fund, specifically to cover a sudden job loss, unexpected medical expense, or urgent home or car repair without needing to rely on high interest debt to get through it. Some financial commentators argue that number is genuinely too conservative for people with unstable income or dependents, and recommend closer to a full year of expenses instead, while others argue that even three months is overly cautious for someone with genuinely stable employment and could be better used investing for long term growth instead.

What counts as the right amount clearly depends heavily on individual circumstances, job security, number of dependents, existing access to other credit, but the underlying debate over how much safety net is actually necessary versus how much is simply money sitting idle rather than working for you continues regardless. How many months of expenses do you personally think is genuinely the right target, and how did you actually arrive at that specific number?