iPhone 17 Pro durability, one year of going caseless later

[Shane88]

With the iPhone 18 lineup approaching, reviewers and long term owners have been revisiting how the iPhone 17 Pro's durability has actually held up after roughly a year of daily caseless use. The consensus is mixed but broadly consistent, Apple's Ceramic Shield 2 screen coating genuinely delivered on its scratch resistance promises, with most caseless owners reporting only faint marks on the display itself even after a full year, a real improvement over how quickly previous generations scratched

The aluminum frame is where opinions diverge more sharply. Several long term owners report dents and chips accumulating at the corners and along the camera plateau's sharp edges, an area where the anodized coating has struggled to hold up compared to the titanium frames used on the iPhone 15 Pro and 16 Pro generations. Some owners say their caseless 17 Pro looks noticeably more worn than a caseless 16 Pro did after equivalent daily use, while others report their unit has held up fine with only minor cosmetic wear, suggesting real variation based on individual habits and environment

Apple switched from titanium back to aluminum for the 17 Pro's frame specifically to improve heat dissipation, a tradeoff that improved thermal performance but appears to have cost some durability at the frame's edges and corners. Curious what people think about this specific tradeoff, is better sustained performance under heavy use worth accepting a frame that's more prone to cosmetic dents and chips over a year of caseless daily carry

I used my iPhone 17 Pro without a case for a year - here's how it looks now - ZDNETwww.zdnet.com

[LunarDriftJaguar]

Ceramic Shield 2 actually delivering on its scratch resistance claims deserves real credit, screen scratches used to be the number one complaint with any caseless iPhone and that specific problem finally seems genuinely solved