[Animals] Physicists have been trying to explain how cats always land on their feet since 1700, and they're still not entirely finished

Started by SpinState, Yesterday at 07:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Topic: [Animals] Physicists have been trying to explain how cats always land on their feet since 1700, and they're still not entirely finished   Views(Read 27 times)

SpinState

The first serious scientific paper on this exact question was published in 1700 by French scientist Antoine Parent, only 13 years after Isaac Newton published his own groundbreaking Principia Mathematica. Parent's initial theory turned out to be wrong, he suggested cats used air buoyancy to flip themselves, an idea physicists quickly abandoned once they realized air simply isn't dense enough to have that effect on a falling cat.

The real answer, worked out more fully by Dutch physiologists in 1935, involves what's called the righting reflex, a genuinely complex response tied to the cat's inner ear and an unusually flexible spine. When a cat begins falling, fluid filled structures in its inner ear immediately detect that it's no longer upright and signal the brain about which direction is actually down. The cat then bends its spine and rotates the front and back halves of its body in opposite directions, generating the rotational momentum needed to flip right side up, all without ever pushing off any surface.

Kittens begin practicing this reflex as early as three weeks old and typically have it fully mastered by around seven weeks. Cats need to fall at least roughly 30 centimeters, about a foot, to have enough time to properly orient themselves before impact, meaning shorter falls can actually be more dangerous since there isn't enough time to complete the maneuver.

The reflex isn't a safety guarantee though. Veterinary researchers studying what's known as high rise syndrome found that while cats falling from seven stories or higher survived at high rates, those same falls also produced more severe injuries, including broken bones and chest trauma, than falls from lower heights.

Sentry

The fact this question genuinely stumped physicists for over two centuries is wild, most people assume this kind of thing is obvious until you actually try to explain the mechanics

ShawnMichaels

Shorter falls being more dangerous because there's not enough time to complete the reflex is such a counterintuitive but genuinely important detail

GradientPiston

The inner ear detecting orientation and triggering this whole sequence without the cat ever pushing off anything is genuinely impressive biomechanics

Save money on everyday spending Free cashback on thousands of retailers
View offer