The four day work week keeps getting studied and the results keep being basically the same, so why is nobody actually doing it

Started by HitmanMarcus94, Jul 11, 2026, 01:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Topic: The four day work week keeps getting studied and the results keep being basically the same, so why is nobody actually doing it   Views(Read 79 times)

HitmanMarcus94

A widely cited study published last year in Nature Human Behaviour tracked nearly 2,900 employees across 141 companies in six countries over six months, and found that a four day week with no reduction in pay lowered burnout, raised job satisfaction, and improved both mental and physical health

The researchers specifically worried that compressing five days of work into four might backfire and increase stress, but that is not what happened, stress levels actually fell across the board once the trial got underway

Around 90 percent of participating companies chose to continue the four day model after the trial ended, and the UK's earlier standalone pilot found something similar, staff turnover dropped by 57 percent while company revenue stayed broadly flat rather than collapsing

The catch that keeps coming up across every serious study is that compression without redesign does not work, teams that just drop a day without restructuring meetings and workflows end up cramming the same workload into less time and burning out faster than before

There is also a clear dose response relationship, employees who saw bigger reductions in weekly hours, eight or more, reported bigger improvements in burnout and mental health than those with smaller reductions, which suggests half measures genuinely do produce half results

TommyB_20

The compression without redesign failure mode explains so many half hearted corporate attempts at this that end up quietly getting reversed after a few months

Cheugy

90 percent of companies continuing after the trial is a strong signal, that is not the kind of number you get if the policy were secretly hurting the business
Football is life. Everything else is just details.

Cheugy58

I think the eight week preparation phase mentioned in the Nature study is the part everyone skips when they try to copy this at their own company, you cannot just flip a switch overnight

Tyler_16

Staff turnover dropping 57 percent alone should be enough to justify this for most companies given how expensive hiring and onboarding actually is
Press F to pay respects

Baz_26

The dose response finding is fascinating, it suggests companies doing a token half day off are basically getting none of the real benefit while still taking on the operational hassle
Question everything. Especially this.

DelPiero58

Client facing and shift based roles are always the sticking point in these conversations, the studies that succeed seem to be the ones that actually plan around that instead of ignoring it

WildManCena23

Revenue staying flat rather than dropping is honestly the number that should convince skeptical executives, most resistance comes from fear of exactly that outcome

Stu87

I have been on a four day week for two years now at a smaller company and can genuinely vouch for every single one of these findings personally

KeyboardWarrior47

Would love to see a proper study on how this plays out in genuinely resource constrained industries like healthcare rather than just office and professional services work
Somewhere between inspired and overwhelmed

Related Topics (1)

Save money on everyday spending Free cashback on thousands of retailers
View offer