What are the membergroups levels?

Started by QuantumKnight, Jan 05, 2026, 08:08 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Topic: What are the membergroups levels?   Views(Read 53 times)

QuantumKnight

Can you let us know what the post group levels are please
To infinity & 🐝 ond

VB

The truth is usually more complicated than the headline

Quanta


codeberg

That is the conclusion most people land on eventually. The fastest fix is often just checking what is running in the background and killing half of it.

Worth trying before anything more drastic

QuantumKnight

Been reading the same thing from a few different angles. I try to find two or three different sources before forming a proper view on something like this.

Worth keeping an eye on
To infinity & 🐝 ond

QuantumKnight

Seems like it from what I have seen. More to come on this I suspect.

Name | Icons | Members | Required posts  |
Quantum Novice | * | 38 | 0 |
Particle Explorer | ** | 40 | 10 |
Wavefunction Wanderer | *** | 38 | 25 |
Superposition Starter | **** | 25 | 50 |
Entanglement Enthusiast | ***** | 1 | 100 |
Qubit Handler | ****** | 5 | 200 |
Quantum Researcher | ******* | 0 | 300 |
Probability Navigator | ******** | 0 | 500 |
Schrödinger's Scholar | ********* | 0 | 750 |
Heisenberg's Apprentice | ********** | 0 | 1000 |
Quantum Engineer | *********** | 0 | 1500 |
Decoherence Master | ************ | 0 | 2000 |

and a few other non-post based ones

Administrator
Quantum Moderator
Wavefunction Guardian
Collapse Controller
Dirac Legend
Einstein Elite
Feynman Fellow
Planck Pioneer
Spin Master

QD? what are these
To infinity & 🐝 ond

Totally

QuoteSeems like it from what I have seen. More to come on this I suspect.

Good shout. Proper useful that
Have you tried turning it off and on again?

Quanta

Not fully convinced by that part of it. Worth ruling out the simple stuff before going further.

That is the sensible starting point

VB

That is about where I am at. Definitely worth picking up
The truth is usually more complicated than the headline

VidiTechnica

QuoteThat is the conclusion most people land on eventually. The fastest fix is often just checking what is running in the background and killing

Cheers for that. Ha, fair enough. :D
Be excellent to each other

Ellie22

I had been looking at it the wrong way I think. Going to look that up properly
My team is always one signing away

MiniElliot

QuoteNot fully convinced by that part of it. Worth ruling out the simple stuff before going further. That is the sensible starting point.

Pretty much my experience. Can't really go wrong with it

DQ Eric

That is how I do it and it works. Every bit helps at the moment
git commit -m "fixed everything"

Maxximus

Agree, and the implications are bigger than most people realise. More to come on this I suspect

QuantumKnight

Been reading the same thing from a few different angles. A lot depends on who is making the claim and what they are trying to sell alongside it.

Curious to see how this develops
To infinity & 🐝 ond

Inland Aidan

QuoteThat is how I do it and it works. Every bit helps at the moment.

That is the sensible route. Measure twice and all that, but also factor in that it always takes longer than you think.

Post a photo when it is done
I read every reply. Even the bad ones.

TheRizz

Interesting, I had the opposite experience. Good stuff

Craig

Yes, and there is more to it too. I find the most honest reactions come out a while after the initial response settles.

I find these conversations more useful than reading reviews

FrostBear


Rob98

QuoteInteresting, I had the opposite experience. Good stuff.

I have heard that but I am not sure it holds up. I know exactly what you mean.

Cheers for sharing
Measure twice, post once

QuantumDay

They haven't changed so far.

As we have been almost entirely spam free so far and mod-lite
I'm not always right, but I'm never wrong ;)