Can we have pretty titled links rather than topic=10?

Started by One-One-Five, Feb 03, 2026, 08:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Topic: Can we have pretty titled links rather than topic=10?   Views(Read 155 times)

One-One-Five

Please and thank you in advance

HeartbreakKidOscar97

Yeah but they would be prettier when in posts

Pixel Mark

It's already planned he said
git commit -m "fixed everything"

Lucy05

Powering through bugs  optimizing systems for peak oz performance

Jarvis

Like he said it's already in the works, if Codeberg it will work great

Maxximus

QuoteIt's already planned he said

That is pretty much what I took from it too. That is my read on it anyway

Static Estuary

Sorted it the same way. Should be fine if you take your time
git commit -m "fixed everything"

Bright Hermit

Still think the same, yeah. Statistics tell part of the story but they never capture the full picture.

Ask me again in six weeks. :)

DarkEnergy27


Tel92

Pretty URLs are one of those things you don't notice until you go back to numeric ones and suddenly every link looks like a database export. Cleaner links are easier to remember and nicer to share too.

Anvil79

I support it mostly for usability rather than looks. If somebody sends me a link called /can-we-have-pretty-titled-links I instantly know what I'm opening. topic=10 could be anything from feature request to cat pictures.

Rob72

Small warning though, if this gets added please make sure old links still resolve. Nothing ages a forum faster than years of dead bookmarks because someone got ambitious with URL rewrites.

CMPunk02

I used to think this was cosmetic until I started searching my own browser history. Human-readable URLs are weirdly useful.

Also topic=10 has a certain retro charm that says "this site survived three migrations and refuses to explain itself."

Bright Hermit

If it's already sorted then excellent, one less tiny irritation gone. These are the kinds of improvements nobody celebrates but everyone quietly appreciates after a week.

MiguelCardozo

I'm mildly against if it turns into massive routing complexity for very little gain. Numeric IDs are boring but dependable.

That said, best version is probably both: keep the ID and append the title for readability.

ShawnMichaels99

Agreed in principle but I hope titles aren't treated as permanent identifiers. People rename topics all the time and nobody wants arguments because somebody changed "help" into "solved" and broke twenty links.

QuantumDay

We do have the url links with the board AND the topic name in the url
including this topic  8)

https://qday.forum/feedback-suggestions/can-we-have-pretty-titled-links-rather-than-topic10/

any older links will redirect
I'm not always right, but I'm never wrong ;)

One-One-Five


Sandra93

Looks like this one solved itself. :P I had completely forgotten the pretty title links were already there because I spend half the time copying URLs straight from the address bar without paying attention. Nice little reminder that sometimes the feature you're asking for has been quietly doing its job all along.

That said, making the option a bit more visible wouldn't hurt. If multiple people can miss it, there's probably room for a clearer setting or a mention in the documentation. Features only help if people know they exist. :-[

NightHarbour30

Even if the links are already available, I can see why the question came up. The old style query string is so familiar that it's easy to assume that's still the only format, especially if you've got bookmarks or old posts lying around.

Pretty URLs definitely make links look cleaner when sharing them outside the forum, and they're a bit nicer to read too. They're not something visitors usually think about, but they do give the site a more polished feel. Glad this turned out to be a case of "it's already there" rather than needing a whole new feature. :)

Related Topics (6)