Windows, Mac or Linux, which operating system philosophy actually gets it right?

[WWEHarry78]

The operating system debate has been running for decades now and shows no real sign of ever being settled, largely because each option is genuinely optimised around a different priority entirely. Windows leans hard into broad compatibility and customisation, running on an enormous range of hardware from budget laptops to high end gaming rigs, at the cost of a less unified overall experience. MacOS prioritises a tightly controlled, polished ecosystem where hardware and software are designed together from the start, trading flexibility for consistency and reliability.

Linux, meanwhile, offers something neither of the other two really can, genuine user control over almost every part of the system, from the desktop environment down to the kernel itself, at the cost of a steeper learning curve and less consistent out of the box support for some hardware and software. Which philosophy do you think actually gets the balance right, or do you think the honest answer is that none of them are objectively correct and it entirely depends on what you personally need from a computer?