Open Source Software Maintenance Is Burning Out Everyone: Is There a Solution?

[ECWAlfie47]

Critical infrastructure runs on open source software maintained by volunteers who get paid nothing. Log4j OpenSSL left-pad. Every few years we discover a vulnerability in something millions of people depend on and realize the person maintaining it in their spare time can barely keep up. The entire tech economy is built on unpaid labor. Companies profit. Users benefit. The maintainers burn out. We know this is happening. Companies throw money at the problem occasionally but without structural change it continues. The economics are broken. Either companies need to fund maintainers properly or we need to accept that critical infrastructure will have vulnerabilities.

[HitmanMatt53]

This is what happens when you build for free. You get free-tier maintenance. Supply equals demand

[AEWCallum93]

Companies using open source should be legally required to contribute back. Either code or money or both

[NorthernKernel]

Some of this is being solved. Linux Foundation now funds critical project maintainers. It's working but it's a band-aid

[Highland Builder]

The real solution is hiring full-time open source developers. Red Hat does this. Other companies should too

[BiscuitTin]

Individual developers can't compete with corporate software so open source attracts idealists and volunteers. Mix it with burnout and you get the current situation

[Ruby92]

Some projects have sponsorship models now. GitHub, Patreon, direct corporate funding. It helps but adoption is spotty

[ThreadNecro98]

The mindset that software should be free is the root cause. Free software is great but it needs funding

[CollapseState47]

We need to teach companies that paying for open source maintenance is security hygiene not charity