AI Art vs Human Intent Where Is the Line

[WaveFunction34]

https://openai.com/research/dall-e

https://openai.com/research/dall-e

AI can now generate high-quality art from text prompts. The question is shifting from "is this art" to "who is the artist" and "what is intent."

[Paige_68]

The prompter is the artist because they define the constraints

[HeartbreakKidOscar97]

The model creators are the real artists, users are just operators

[CodyRhodes99]

I like some generated works

[CosmicRay40]

Intent matters more than tool, same debate happened with photography

[Distant Sienna]

Not worth cutting corners on that part. Turned out alright when I did it.

[NinaVrina]

That is the conclusion most people land on eventually. I keep a list of what I do to every fresh install so I can repeat it without thinking.

That is how I would approach it anyway.

[IronWolf]

That is the nuanced version of it. There is a kind of restraint in the best of this that is harder to achieve than it looks.

There is a lot more to say about this.

[DarkEnergy27]

That is the sensible approach. The switching bonuses are usually the best bang for almost zero effort.

Might save you more than you think.

[QuietNomad]

I like some generated works

Kind of depends I think. I have started just watching twenty minutes of gameplay before buying anything.

Definitely worth picking up.

[Steady Dylan]

Okay that makes more sense than what I had in my head. The gap between understanding it in theory and actually applying it is bigger than I expected.

Might have to look into that more.

[CosmicRay67]

Sorted it the same way. Buy slightly more materials than you need, you will always use them.

Worth doing it properly rather than rushing it.

[CrimsonFury]

Couldn't agree more. Every time without fail.

Good thread this.