MJF_Fan

The GOAT conversation needs to include Mitsuharu Misawa. If we are talking influence on modern in-ring wrestling, his impact is enormous.

A lot of the style people praise today has roots in what he and others were doing in Japan.

He may not be the first name casual fans mention, but wrestlers certainly know his importance.

EventHorizon25

I think Roman Reigns deserves more respect in this debate. People criticised him for years, but his character work and big match presence have improved massively.

The Bloodline storyline showed he could carry a long-term story at the highest level.

Maybe not number one yet, but the final chapter of his career could change opinions.
Posted from a machine that definitely needs a clean install

MachineSaint69

The answer changes depending on whether we mean greatest or favourite. My favourite might not even make my top five objectively.

That is why these discussions never end. Wrestling is part sport, part performance and part personal memory.

The match you watched at the right moment can mean more than any ranking.

Scholar70

Danielson is a fascinating pick because he might actually be the wrestler's wrestler. Other wrestlers constantly praise his ability to make matches work.

The only argument against him is that the GOAT title usually includes cultural impact too.

If someone says he is the best pure wrestler ever, I cannot really argue.
Be excellent to each other, entangled or not

CosmicRay17

I would put Randy Savage higher than a lot of lists do. The intensity, the voice, the movement and the storytelling were all unique.

Even simple things like his facial expressions made every moment feel important.

He was not just performing moves, he was creating a character people remembered.

GatewayDrifter

Not enough love for Samoa Joe in these discussions. At his best he had a believable style that felt completely different from everyone else.

His intensity made every match feel like a fight rather than just a performance.

He may not have the biggest legacy, but his prime was incredible.

David1

One thing that gets overlooked is consistency. Having one amazing year is impressive, but staying excellent across decades is a different challenge.

That is why names like Jericho, Michaels and Flair always come back into the discussion.

Longevity matters when talking about all-time greatness.

BinaryMonk91

If I had to build a Mount Rushmore, I would probably have Austin, Flair, Michaels and Hogan.

That does not mean they are automatically the four best wrestlers technically.

It just shows how many different ways there are to define greatness in this business.
sudo train me a model

Backprop Freddie

The funniest thing about GOAT debates is someone always says a wrestler from 40 years ago and someone else says a wrestler from last week.

The industry has changed so much that comparisons are messy.

Personally, I enjoy hearing the arguments more than finding a final answer.

Layla86

Chris Jericho deserves a mention because his longevity is almost absurd. The guy has reinvented himself multiple times and stayed relevant through completely different eras.

Many wrestlers have a great peak. Fewer can remain interesting for decades.

That ability alone puts him near the top for me.

LordJonathan92

I know this will not be everyone's choice, but I would make a case for Eddie Kingston as someone who understands wrestling emotion better than almost anyone today.

He proves that connecting with the crowd does not require being the biggest or most athletic person.

The ability to make people believe in you is still the heart of wrestling.

Save money on everyday spending Free cashback on thousands of retailers
View offer