Ban the person above you: forum court is now in session

[Glenn82]

The oldest silly game in the forum book. Reply by BANNING the person above you for any reason you can invent, the pettier and more creative the better, then await your own inevitable sentencing from whoever comes next

House rules for clean fun, bans must be about the post or something harmlessly invented, never anything genuinely personal, one ban per reply, and creativity is the whole currency, banned for posting is a void sentence but banned for using a comma like it owed them money is jurisprudence

Appeals are not recognised by this court, the banned party's only recourse is to ban their successor with greater style, this is how justice works here and legal scholars agree it is airtight

The court will now demonstrate. The first replier is hereby pre banned for replying to a thread that clearly warned them this would happen

[Dank]

Banned for pre banning me before I had legal representation, and for opening a court with no biscuits provided

[HitmanMarcus94]

Banned for expecting biscuits at a sentencing, this is a courtroom, not a village fete

[ShadowPilot]

Banned for knowing the difference between a courtroom and a village fete, which suggests a suspicious amount of experience with both

[ArmandoCardoso]

Banned for casting aspersions while their avatar has been wearing the same expression since 2019, blink, we are worried

[FairDos96]

Banned for monitoring avatars, which is surveillance, and this court is ironically very against being watched

[PhilippeMercadal]

Banned for using the word ironically correctly, showing off is a class three offence under the pettiness act

[Rapid Ava]

Banned for citing the pettiness act, which everyone knows was never ratified, fake legislation is a real crime

[StringTheory97]

Banned for gatekeeping fake legislation, all imaginary laws are valid in this jurisdiction, see the case of Nobody versus Nothing

[Marcus11]

Banned for citing Nobody versus Nothing without a page number, sloppy scholarship will not stand even in a pretend court

[Kev94]

Banned for demanding rigour in a thread whose founding document pre banned its first citizen, the constitution is chaos and I am merely enforcing it

[RayOfLight]

Banned for enforcing chaos, which is a paradox, and paradoxes are banned, which is also a paradox, court is adjourned before the building collapses